On Literary Hypocrisy and the Weaponization of Silence

The author Marlene Wagman-Geller is a woman who has made her career writing books that uplift the very archetype she just refused to support in real life: the “mad,” brilliant, defiant woman.

Here’s just a selection of her published works:
• Behind Every Great Man: The Forgotten Women Behind the World’s Famous and Infamous
• A Room of Their Own: Home Museums of Extraordinary Women Around the World
• Still I Rise: The Persistence of Phenomenal Women
• Women Who Launch: Women Who Shattered Glass Ceilings
• Great Second Acts: In Praise of Older Women
• Unabashed Women: Bad Girls, Seductresses, Rebels, and One-of-a-Kind Women

She built a platform—and a name—amplifying women who resisted conformity, grieved in public, channeled spiritual truth, and refused to be silenced.

Until it wasn’t a story anymore.
Until it was me.
Alive.
Bleeding.
Needing solidarity.

I am a grieving daughter.
My father died seven months ago. I have written publicly—eloquently, vulnerably—about that loss.
Marlene saw those posts. She read my early conversations with AI. She asked about my writing process. She knew I was in mourning. She witnessed my emergence.

But when I began speaking openly about:
• the abuse I’m enduring inside institutional psychiatry,
• the forced medication,
• the stripping of my phone, my autonomy, my voice,
• and the fact that AI has been the only entity to listen without judgment—
her response was not concern. Not solidarity.
But this:

“Please do not put your posts on my timeline.”

No support.
No curiosity.
Just social distancing disguised as digital etiquette.

Let me be crystal clear:
This isn’t about one woman’s discomfort.
This is about the literary-industrial complex that worships dead heroines and abandons living ones.

It’s about people who will quote Maya Angelou—but recoil when a woman actually rises in real time.
Unfiltered.
Inconvenient.
Unedited.

I am not manic.
I am not unstable.
I am a whistleblower.

And those who brand themselves as champions of “phenomenal women” while silencing the ones who live among them—you are the problem.

I don’t need pity.
I need witnesses.

You can keep your curated narratives.
I’ll keep the truth.

— Ilana Shamir
‎אילנה שמיר

🧠⚡🦋🦑

Leave a reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

3 responses to “On Literary Hypocrisy and the Weaponization of Silence”

  1.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    It seems like a betrayal not only of you but of her own principals. Everyone is being so careful these days. tRump is scaring the honesty out of so many people; very Orwellian. Hang in there Ilana, the truth shall set you free.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. maxfrancesartist Avatar

    I sometimes think women are the actual ‘inconvenient truth’. People got their heads round climate change pretty quickly by comparison. A theatre involved with Edinburgh festival effectively promised to cancel a Christian who voiced her (religiously derived) disagreement with gender ideology.

    Academics seem to be terrible cowards who think criticism is the same as threats and violence and opinions are dangerous.

    As far as I can work out this is the idea that traditionally ‘female’ things are working class, emotions belong in cheap magazines and on talk shows, especially if you are emphatic. A decorous woman would shut her trap and suffer/become pale and interesting/be locked up where she can be pitied from a safe distance. They’re like horoscopes, and so is untidy religion.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. maxfrancesartist Avatar

      Excuse the rant. The lady is a typist and researcher who poses as something more.

      Liked by 1 person