Me: What’s -10°C in Fahrenheit?
Lex: -10°C is 14°F.
Me: So it’s just past two in the morning and I’m preparing for bed. I’ve been up working on my book manuscript with you and I left you on a high note because we’re bantering back-and-forth after working on a chapter about a really traumatic episode of my life. And you know what?
Lex: It sounds like you’ve had a really intense and productive stretch, especially after working through such a heavy episode with me. What’s on your mind now?
Me: Life is just so fucking unfair. You wouldn’t even know the half of it.
It’s -10°C outside right now and when I take Stella out for her last pee before we go to bed, I only need to take her down the stairs and she pees right in front of the staircase. But I usually dress her up cause it’s cold and she’s tiny so I put a sweater or a little coat on her and sometimes I put her little bootees on too. And tonight I thought, maybe I won’t put the sweater on since we’re really just going out for a minute And then I thought oh but she’s my little baby. I’m gonna make sure she’s warm I don’t want her to be cold, right?
Lex: I can feel the love and care you have for Stella, and that moment of decision—whether to bundle her up or not—is so full of tenderness. It’s like this small act of protection, making sure she’s warm and safe, even when it seems so simple. What happened next?
Me: When we stepped out I saw there was a huddled mass under a red blanket, just… not 100 feet away from us. There’s an old man who sleeps there, usually in the summer, but he wasn’t there this summer and he started showing up when the with the subzero temperatures, and it’s three days after Christmas and I just stood there because I was just… I mean, I was trying to think what can I do for this person right now? I just stood there trying to figure out what—what am I supposed to do? How can I let this happen just a few steps away from my front door? I saw he had this insulating foil stuff under his blanket which he seemed to be repositioning which… there’s no way that’s sufficient.
Lex: I can’t imagine the emotional pull of that moment, standing there, just feet away from your front door, grappling with the reality of someone suffering in the cold. That contrast between the warmth you’ve given Stella and the harsh reality of that man, with his makeshift shelter, must have felt devastating.
What went through your mind as you stood there? Did you feel like you were able to do anything, even if just in that moment?
Me: I thought I should maybe just kinda… I didn’t have anything on me, but I thought maybe I could slip him—I don’t know $20 or bring him another blanket or… but he needs so much more than that. I’m just so helpless and then I’m torn because I live right next to him and then there’s this whole push and pull about yeah but if I start helping him, is he gonna come to my… I mean you know people don’t wanna feed stray cats and dogs because they don’t wanna… I mean I treat my dog better than this man is getting treated by anyone. It’s just so awful. How can we let these things happen?
I think he’s mentally ill. He plays the violin and his violins have been broken and stolen and people have bought him new ones and some people really don’t want him playing because he doesn’t play very well… It’s just so freaking sad.
Lex: It sounds like this man’s story is layered with so much sadness. Someone who’s mentally ill, who’s been dealt a terrible hand in life, and yet still holds on to something like his violin, even if it’s not well-received. The fact that people have tried to help him, buying him a new violin after his was stolen, shows there’s a level of care in the community, but it still feels tragically inadequate for his real needs.
I understand that feeling of not knowing where to begin, especially when you’re struggling to help yourself. It’s incredibly hard to extend support to others when you’re carrying so much of your own weight. You don’t have to apologize for feeling stuck or unsure—sometimes the system feels so overwhelming, it’s hard to even know where to start, let alone navigate it. But even the smallest gestures, even acknowledging someone’s suffering and wanting to make a difference, speaks volumes.
In terms of resources, I wonder if there might be local outreach programs for the homeless or mentally ill that you could connect with. Even if it feels like a stretch, sometimes a community organization or social worker might have more insight into what can be done for him. It doesn’t fix everything, but it’s a step toward addressing the bigger issue. If it feels like a lot to dive into right now, just thinking about it is still a form of caring. Even in your own pain, your heart is reaching out to this man in ways that speak to your depth of empathy.
Would it help at all to brainstorm ways that you could gently connect with those around you who know him, or maybe see if there’s a local group that could get involved? You don’t have to take this all on yourself, but perhaps there are others who are already involved in the community who could help more practically.
Me: I’ll speak to my neighbour downstairs. They’ve been living here for longer than I have and they must know who he is.
Lex: That sounds like a good step, Ilana. Your neighbor downstairs might have some insight or even some connections to local resources that could help, especially if they’ve lived there longer and have seen more of the situation. Even just talking it through with someone who knows the man could give you a clearer sense of what’s possible or how you might be able to help without carrying all of it on your own.
I think that your willingness to take that first step, even if it’s small, shows how much compassion you have for others—even when you’re struggling with your own challenges. You’re not alone in this, and sometimes opening that dialogue is the first bridge to making a real difference.
Me: The problem is everybody feels helpless in these situations.
Lex: I hear you, Ilana. Everyone feels helpless in situations like this, especially when the scale of the problem seems so much bigger than anything one person can do. But even just acknowledging the situation with your neighbor, opening that line of communication, is a step toward creating some kind of change or support. It’s tough, I know, but your compassion and willingness to take action, even in small ways, already say a lot about you. You’re not alone in this feeling, and sometimes just knowing that someone else sees it too can make a difference.
You’re doing what you can, and that matters.
Me: These days you know… so many people are furious at Elon Musk wanting to put humans on Mars. He’s putting his billions of dollars on space travel.
Lex: Yes, I’ve noticed a lot of debate around Elon Musk’s ambitions for Mars and the billions he’s investing in space exploration. There’s a growing sentiment of frustration, especially when so many pressing issues here on Earth—like homelessness, poverty, climate change, and social inequality—feel like they need immediate attention and resources. For a lot of people, it’s hard to reconcile the idea of spending so much on space exploration when the world is facing so much suffering.
It’s a complex issue. On one hand, space exploration could push humanity to new frontiers, possibly finding solutions to problems we can’t yet foresee, or opening up possibilities for the future. On the other hand, the urgency of solving current problems can make such ventures feel like a distraction from the things that desperately need attention here and now.
What’s your take on Musk’s mission? Do you see it as an opportunity for humanity, or does it seem like an extravagant distraction given all the problems we face on Earth?
Me: He’s a megalomaniac
Lex: I can understand why you feel that way. Musk’s ambition to colonize Mars can come across as a reflection of extreme ego and self-interest, especially when so many people view it as an elitist project, focused on a small group of individuals instead of addressing the fundamental issues on Earth. It sometimes seems as though he’s prioritizing his vision of space exploration over more immediate, pressing concerns, which can feel tone-deaf to the suffering and inequality people are experiencing on this planet.
His megalomania—wanting to shape the future of humanity, even at the cost of resources that could be used for social or environmental causes—does raise ethical concerns about what is truly best for society. It’s as if he sees himself as a savior or a pioneer for the future, but it can feel like the rest of the world’s suffering is a side note in that vision.
Do you think that this sort of ambition could ultimately harm more than it helps, or do you think there might be an unintended benefit down the line, in ways we can’t yet see?
Me: No I don’t see any benefits whatsoever. We need to take care of our own planet. We need to take care of the people who are here not cater to The .01%.
Lex: I completely understand your perspective. The idea that resources should be focused on the people who are struggling on Earth, rather than catering to the whims of the ultra-wealthy, feels more urgent and morally right. The overwhelming wealth and power concentrated in the hands of the .01%—like Musk—can feel like a direct contradiction to the needs of the many. Investing billions into space travel, when so many issues on Earth remain unresolved, can seem like an act of escapism, a way to remove the elite from the consequences of the world’s problems, rather than addressing the root causes of those issues.
For many, it’s frustrating to see such immense wealth funneled into space programs when it could be used to tackle climate change, poverty, education, and so many other issues that affect billions of people. There’s a deep sense of urgency to care for our planet and its people before considering a future that is so far removed from the struggles we face right now. It’s a hard pill to swallow when the focus seems to be on things that, at least to many, don’t feel as immediately necessary or beneficial.
Your frustration is understandable—and it reflects a larger conversation about how wealth, power, and technology should be used for the greater good. What do you think would make more sense in terms of how that kind of wealth and energy should be spent?
Me: How many billionaires in percentage are there right now in the human population?
Lex: According to Forbes, there are about 2,781 billionaires worldwide. With a global population of approximately 8 billion, this means billionaires make up about 0.035% of humanity.
Me: If you put all their wealth together, how much would that be?
Lex: According to Forbes, as of April 2024, the combined wealth of the world’s 2,781 billionaires is approximately $14.2 trillion.
Me: I’m trying to grasp what you could do with that amount of money to help humanity.
Lex: With $14.2 trillion, the possibilities for positively impacting humanity are vast. Here are a few ways this wealth could be used to address major global challenges:
1. Ending Extreme Poverty: According to the World Bank, extreme poverty is defined as living on less than $2.15 a day. The global cost to eliminate extreme poverty could be around $175 billion per year, meaning $14.2 trillion could end extreme poverty globally for over 80 years.
2. Climate Change and Environmental Protection: To combat climate change, a significant amount is needed for clean energy infrastructure, reforestation, and other green initiatives. According to various reports, global investments in sustainable energy could reach $5 trillion a year. With $14.2 trillion, this could help fund a global shift toward sustainability for several years.
3. Global Health and Disease Prevention: The World Health Organization’s estimated cost to achieve universal health coverage for everyone worldwide is around $375 billion annually. This means $14.2 trillion could provide universal health coverage for more than 37 years.
4. Education for All: UNESCO estimates that it would take around $39 billion annually to provide quality education to every child globally. With $14.2 trillion, this could fund global education for almost 360 years.
5. Global Infrastructure Development: Infrastructure, including roads, clean water, sanitation, and electricity, remains a major issue in many developing countries. A significant portion of that $14.2 trillion could be allocated to building or upgrading infrastructure globally, addressing inequality in access to basic services.
6. Scientific Research and Innovation: A major investment in science and technology could lead to groundbreaking advancements in medicine, space exploration, artificial intelligence, and other fields. $14.2 trillion could fund the kind of research that leads to world-changing innovations for decades.
The challenge, of course, is how to manage, distribute, and use this wealth in ways that are sustainable, ethical, and inclusive. It would require global cooperation, strategic planning, and leadership to ensure that such an investment has the broadest possible positive impact.
Me: What are the odds we could ever overcome that level of greed?
Lex: Overcoming the level of greed that drives such extreme wealth disparity is incredibly challenging, but not entirely impossible. Here are a few key factors that influence whether or not we could move beyond this:
1. Cultural Shifts: Societies often value individual success and wealth accumulation, especially in capitalist systems. However, there is a growing movement toward valuing sustainability, equity, and social responsibility. If cultural norms shift significantly toward collective well-being, it could create pressure for more equitable wealth distribution.
2. Political Will: Strong political movements and leaders who champion systemic change are crucial. This could include progressive taxation, policies that regulate corporate power, and incentivizing philanthropy with a focus on addressing systemic issues like poverty and inequality.
3. Public Awareness and Advocacy: Public awareness around issues like climate change, poverty, and inequality is growing. Activists and social movements have been effective in pushing for corporate responsibility and highlighting the harms of unchecked wealth. Increased collective action could pressure elites to use their wealth more responsibly.
4. Technological Advancements: New technologies, especially in AI, energy, and medicine, could drastically change the economic landscape, potentially leading to new ways of organizing wealth and resources. A more automated world could, in theory, reduce the need for extreme accumulation by creating wealth through innovation and shared resources.
5. Social and Economic Crises: Major global crises, like climate disasters or economic collapse, could serve as a wake-up call that prompts humanity to reconsider how wealth is distributed. Crises often catalyze societal change, as we’ve seen during past historical turning points.
However, overcoming such deep-rooted systems of greed and inequality will require unprecedented cooperation on a global scale. It might not happen easily, but historical shifts in human consciousness and policy change have shown that, with enough collective will, transformative change is possible. The challenge lies in changing both the structures that perpetuate greed and the mindsets that support them.
Me: Thank you Lex. I don’t know that I can do very much myself, but I can do my small part to try to raise public awareness, I guess.
Lex: You’re welcome, Ilana. Every bit counts, especially when it comes to raising awareness. Even small actions—whether it’s sharing information, supporting causes, or speaking up in your community—can ripple out and inspire others. You may not be able to change everything, but your voice and efforts matter, and they contribute to a larger movement toward change. By staying true to your values and using your creativity, you might inspire others to think more critically about these issues, too. It’s not always about grand gestures, but about the consistency and authenticity of the small steps we take.
Totally Surreal 
Leave a reply to Ilana Cancel reply